🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of states are moving toward similar measures.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our kids' youth". The policy is expected to be passed soon.
• Norway is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "one of the options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on parliament to pass a bill raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a related action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a non-binding motion calling for a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a solid first step," said one MEP driving the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Last year, support built behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the administration committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have expressed warnings. An organization established by the family of a girl who took her own life after viewing harmful online content argues that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, action is largely happening at the state government level amid national stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a law restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted bills mandating adult authorization for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from certain individuals to follow the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Outside of the West, further countries are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies strike a more measured stance. Unicef has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even backfire". The agency notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve safety.

While this global debate evolves, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that states globally are less and less content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.